Composite Sandwich Core
This page will attempt to shed some light on the mechanics of composite sandwich panels. The main points will illustrate:
This page is intended for those who do not have any engineering background but would still like
to get a peek at the inner workings of sandwich cores.
Derivations of Flexure formulas, Moments of Inertia and other complexities are beyond the scope of this page. A lot of assumptions are made for the sake of simplicity. All cross sections are symmetrical about a neutral axis(centriod) and the material is subject to pure bending(flexure).
The best way to visualize the structure of a 'sandwich core panel' is to use the analogy of a simple "I" beam. (see above)
Like the 'I' beam, a sandwich core panel consists of strong skins (flanges) bonded to a core (web). The skins are subject to tension/compression and are largely responsible for the strength of the 'sandwich'. The function of the core is to support the thin skins so that they don't buckle (deform) and stay fixed relative to each other. The core experiences mostly shear stresses (sliding) as well as some degree of vertical tension and compression. Its material properties and thickness determine the stiffness of such a panel.
easiest way to illustrate how the core supports shear stresses is to take a deck of cards or a telephone
book and bend it. You will notice how the individual layers slide or 'shear' past each other.
Now, suppose that the sheets were all glued together. The pages are no longer free to move and the deck becomes very stiff. At this point, the only way the deck could bend is if the layers on the 'tension' side of the 'neutral axis' (red dashed line) stretched and the 'compressed' side squeezed together.
illustrates the shear in a weak core such as the unglued deck of cards or a sheet of elastic material
The skins experience very little stress because the core deforms easily. Such cores are said to have low 'Shear Modulus of Elasticity'
Materials with very low Shear Modulus are unsuitable as structural cores because they cannot withstand shear stress. Boats made with such cores would be weak, excessively flexible, and easily deformed. This would defy the whole point of this construction.
in this illustration would be the equivalent of the deck of cards glued together. The material resists
shear (high Shear Modulus) very well. Note that the sections throughout the core are perpendicular
to the neutral axis (dashed red line).
This means that the 'layers' in the core resists sliding (shear deformation) and the core and skins are forced to stretch and compress.
Skins made of material of high 'Modulus of Elasticity' are best used in conjunction with cores of high 'Shear Modulus'. This balance is important so that neither material fails long before the other is stressed to acceptable level.
For instance, strong Graphite or Kevlar skins bonded to a 'Styrofoam insulation' core would be a complete waste because such 'Low Shear Modulus' core would always fail long before the skin could be stressed to 1% of its potential strength. Of course, for this reason Styrofoam is not considered a structural core material.
As a note of interest;
'End-Grain Balsa wood' (Balsa is the stuff used for model airplanes) makes
for the stiffest and most shear resistant cores known in boatbuilding.
It also shows superior compressive and bonding strength to the skins.
Of course, it doesn't mean that it is the best choice in all situations.
Some cores are less stiff which makes for better impact absorption.
back to the cards. The deck of cards is only made of weak paper and given
enough bending force it would crack and break. The cracking would begin
at the surface and on the side that experienced tension. This failure is
an indication that the stresses at the surface exceed the breaking (tensile)
strength of the paper. Intuitively, it also shows that the largest stresses
are confined to the surface of the deck.
To relieve the high stresses at the surface, a stronger skin must be bonded to the paper. The result is a panel 'composed' of different materials, each with its unique physical properties, thus a 'composite sandwich core'.
illustrates a profile cross section through a sandwich core panel. The bending causes the sandwich
to stretch above the 'Neutral Axis' and to compress below the axis. The neutral axis or neutral
'plane' in real material experiences zero stress and strain.
The original length of the relaxed panel is "L".
As the panel bends, both the core and the skin elongate and shrink linearly (for simplicity) from the neutral axis. The thick black line represents the new section of the panel after bending. (very exaggerated)
Since the skins are firmly glued to the core, both the core and skin will stretch the same amount where they bond together.
important thing to keep in mind is that even though the materials stretch
equally at the skin/core boundary, they both have completely different
physical properties and therefore will react differently to this elongation.
In engineering terms the ratio of the elongation to the original length is expressed as 'strain'.
|The equation means|
strain, it is now possible to find the stresses in both the core and the skins.
It is important to realize that the 'stress' in a three dimensional panel applies to the entire face of the section. The drawings here represent only 2D 'side view'.
This is OK since stress can also be defined as 'force per area', which means that we can think of the arrows in the drawing below as force applied to individual strands or a slice of the sandwich.
|The equation below shows that Strain multiplied by the material's Modulus of Elasticity equals Stress.|
|The equation means|
you will notice that the force (arrows) acting on the skin are far
larger than on the core. This is because the fiberglass skin has
a large Modulus (E =10,000,000 psi) but the core such as wood has
Modulus roughly six times smaller (E = 1,700,000 psi). So, equal
strain at the boundary multiplied by larger Modulus will produce larger
stress in the skin.
The discontinuity of the stress at the skin/core boundary is a clear indication that the fiberglass is absorbing far more tension and compression then the core. The same applies to the simple 'I' beam.
far, it has been only shown that bonding a strong, tensile material to the core will relieve it
of a lot of stress yet make the entire sandwich core stronger.
The real advantage of the sandwich core can be only made clear by comparing it to a single skin fiberglass, subject to the same bending force.
to do this comparison, one more principle must be clarified:
The Applied bending force (Moment)
produces internal reaction forces in the panel (the blue and red arrows) that counteract
such bending. Since there is no acceleration in statics problem like this, it just happens that
the sum of the internal forces(moments) must be equal to the applied
bending force(moments) . In engineering terms, the forces are in 'equilibrium'
of 'mode of failure' in a sandwich core panel
The cores in this case are not structural but serve as a good example of how sandwich cores fail and what happens when the mechanical properties of the skin and core do not match.
|A composite sandwich panel is bent and the skin buckles. In this instance, the core separated close to the skin-core boundary indicating that most of the stresses are concentrated here and that the core could not withstand tension.|
|A similar example of buckling. Here the skin crushes the panel indicating poor compressive strength of the core. The direction of buckling (crushing vs. separation) depends on the curvature of the panel, its stability and applied forces.|
|A panel subject to transverse sheer experiences complete failure of the bond between the skin and core.|
Here is an example of 5mm plywood sandwich core buckling under compression. The kayak hull is only supported at the ends. It will of course be reinforced by the addition of the deck later, but the thing to note is the mode of buckling. This behavior is typical of developable surfaces. A developable surface is formed by wrapping a 'flat' 2D sheet' around a cylindrical or conical body without stretching. So, all cones and cylinders are developable. Because such surface can be 'wrapped' and 'unwrapped' it will also be weak in that plane of bending (as evidenced in this kayak panel). Notice that the 'ripples' in the plywood run in the plane (parallel) in which the kayak side wall is bent. The way to reinforce a developable monocoque surface is to either force it into a non-developable or 'compound' shape (by stretching and twisting) or to subdivide the surface into smaller 'facets' that do not form a developable surface as a unit. This happens to some degree by the addition of the deck. A good example of this principle can also be found in Geodesic structures which assume compound shapes but which are made solely by using developable building blocks (triangles, pentagons, and other polygons). Spherical and hyperbolic surfaces (horse saddle, an egg, sphere) are examples of non-developable surfaces which are considerably stronger since they cannot be easily 'flattened' or distorted without stretching a part of the structure. This property is definitely 'a plus' in compound wood strip kayaks which are far less likely to buckle to this degree under the same amount of stress.
To Wood Core Kayak
|Home||Kayak Designs||Kayak Shop||Materials||Kayak Gallery||About us|
|Building Manual||Plans||Sandwich Core||Wood Kayak||Order|
|Epoxy Test||Abrasion Cloth||Rudder||Resources||Choosing Kayak||Guestbook|
If you notice any problems with the site (i.e. error links, missing images) please, let me know. Thanks
10 Colonial Court apt. 73
Stoneham, MA. 02180
- 2013 Copyright Vaclav Stejskal
All rights reserved
Last page update: 29 October 2013